Pending Reflection

Reflection IV

28^th September 2012

This meeting, the presenters are Aris, Aci, Hamdy, Ima, And Aida”Kajol”.

Aris presented about argumentative paragraph, the topic of his paragraph was women and the topic sentence was women join military. The next presenter is aci. Aci’s paragraph told about definition paragraph, there are no any interruptions, because her paragraph was very clear that that’s definition paragraph. The third presenter was hamdy rois. His paragraph was cause and effect paragraph. In the first time, I thought that rois’ paragraph was exposition paragraph. Because the paragraph just shows the effect, but finally I agree that it is cause and effect paragraph, even the major point is the effect. Next, ima told about a paragraph which she thought that that’s argumentative paragraph, but after read the whole paragraph and understood the main idsea and the purpose of the paragraph, miss vita and us agreed that ima’s paragraph is report paragraph. Little bit difficult to indentify that paragraph but if we read the paragraph carefully, we will know the purpose of the paragraph. And then, the next presenter is aida dewi sukria. She told about cause and effect paragraph. In this case, aida’s paragraph is same with hamdy’s paragraph. The effect stronger than the cause point but I thought that’s good paragraph. The last presenter is aida part 2 (mufrotul faida). She had illustration paragraph. Her paragraph told about Craigh Jones. Illustrate relationship between the writer and Craig jones. Craig Jones is the true friend of the writer.

When workshop, I analyzed aida’s paragraph. She told about the classification of reason why village like city.

 Reflection V

In this meeting, there are two presenters. Lilies presented about two paragraph. The first paragraph was classification paragraph and the second paragraph was process analysis paragraph about scanning. The last presenters were trias. She told about persuasion paragraph. But, because of the paragraph didn’t full fill the characters of persuasion paragraph we discussed it again, finally we decided that trias’ paragraph was explanation paragraph.

Reflection VI

I analyzed dini’s paragraph in process analyses paragraph. There was no mistake and that’s good paragraph. I analyzed aci’s paragraph, there was no big mistake, but must be more careful in punctuation. In argumentative paragraph, I analyzed aida’s paragraph. I found something missing in aidas’ paragraph. Because aida didn’t consider the opposition’s argumentation, so it’s better that she added the information of opposition’s point of view in her paragraph. And the last is illustration and persuasion paragraph. I analyzed lilis’ paragraph. In her persuasion paragraph, I thought that lilis’ paragraph was not persuasion. Because there were not element to convey the reader to do the instruction based on the paragraph, and I changed the paragraph to be persuasion paragraph by using the same information. And ther was no problems with her illustration paragraph. I can understand more by analyzing my friends’ paragraph. We can improve our writing skill by practice it, because when we just know the theory but we never practice it, we cannot measure aour ability.